Áñ°Üã±â Ãß°¡     ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö·Î ¼³Á¤ óÀ½À¸·Î  l  ·Î±×ÀΠ l  È¸¿ø°¡ÀÔ  l  »çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

>
ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ   l   ¾ÆÀ̵ð/ºñ¹Ð¹øȣã±â
¡®Á¦38ȸ 2023³â »ó¹Ý±â ...
¡®Á¦37ȸ 2022³â ÇϹݱâ ...
Á¦37ȸ ¡¸2022³â ÇϹݱâ ...
 
HOME > ÇؿܽÃÀåÁ¤º¸ > ÃֽŴº½º
[2014] [¹Ì±¹] Áö±¸ ¿Â³­È­¸¦ ¿ÏÈ­Çϱâ À§ÇÑ Áö±¸°øÇÐÀÇ ÀûÀýÇÑ ÁøÇà ¹æÇâ
À̸§ °ü¸®ÀÚ waterindustry@hanmail.net ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ 2014.02.24 Á¶È¸¼ö 500
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ
[¹Ì±¹] Áö±¸ ¿Â³­È­¸¦ ¿ÏÈ­Çϱâ À§ÇÑ Áö±¸°øÇÐÀÇ ÀûÀýÇÑ ÁøÇà ¹æÇâ
 
¿¬±¸ÀÚµéÀº ±âÈÄ º¯È­ ¿ÏÈ­ ½Ã³ª¸®¿ÀÀÇ ¹üÀ§¸¦ ³íÀÇÇϸ鼭 žçºûÀ» ¹Ý»çÇÏ¿© Áö±¸ ¿Â³­È­ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» °¨¼Ò½ÃÅ°±â À§ÇØ ´ë±â Áß È²»ê¿° ÀÔÀÚ¸¦ ÁÖÀÔÇÏ´Â Áö±¸°øÇÐÀû Á¢±ÙÀÌ ¹«±âÇÑÀ¸·Î Áö¼ÓµÇÁö ¾Ê°Å³ª ±×°ÍÀÌ ¿Â½Ç°¡½º ¹èÃâÀ» ¿ÏÀüÈ÷ °¨¼Ò½ÃÄÑÁÖÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù¸é ¿ÀÈ÷·Á Áö±¸¿¡ ½É°¢ÇÑ À§ÇùÀ» °¡Á®¿Ã ¼ö ÀÖÀ½À» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù.

º» ¿¬±¸´Â °úÇÐÀú³Î Environmental Research Letters¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© ¹ßÇ¥µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¸¸¾à ÅÂ¾ç º¹»ç °ü¸®(SRM: solar radiation management)°¡ ÇÑ ¹ø µµÀÔµÈ ÈÄ¿¡ ±ÞÀÛ½º·´°Ô Áß´ÜµÉ °æ¿ì, ¿ÀÈ÷·Á ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ ¿ÂµµÀÇ Áõ°¡·Î ÀÎÇÑ À§ÇùÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÒ °ÍÀÓÀ» °­Á¶ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

SRMÀº žçºûÀ» ¹Ý»ç½ÃÄÑ Áö±¸ÀÇ ¿Âµµ¸¦ ³·Ãß±â À§ÇØ ´ë±â »óÃþºÎ¿¡ ¹Ì¼¼ÇÑ È²»ê¿° ¼ººÐÀÇ ÀÔÀÚ¸¦ ÁÖÀÔÇϵµ·Ï Á¦¾ÈµÈ Áö±¸°øÇÐÀû ¹æ¹ý Áß ÇϳªÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ ±â¼úÀº °æÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Î³ª ±â¼úÀûÀ¸·Î °¡´ÉÇÏ´Ù´Â °ÍÀÌ È®ÀεǾúÀ¸³ª ±× È¿À²¼ºÀº Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ °ü¸®, ±â¼úÀÇ °áÇÔÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¹æÇØ, ±¹Á¦ Çù·ÂÀÇ Æı⠶Ǵ ÀçÁ¤ Áö¿øÀÇ °í°¥ µî¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ´Â´Ù.

º» ¿¬±¸¿¡ µû¸£¸é ¸¸¾à SRMÀÌ ¼ö½Ê ³âÀÇ ±â°£ µ¿¾È µµÀԵǾú´Ù°¡ °©ÀÚ±â ÁߴܵǾúÀ» °æ¿ì, Áö±¸ ±â¿ÂÀÇ »ó½ÂÀº SRMÀÌ ¾Æ¿¹ µµÀÔµÇÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ» °æ¿ì¿¡ ¿¹ÃøµÇ´Â ±â¿Â »ó½Âº¸´Ù µÎ ¹è ÀÌ»ó ´õ Áõ°¡ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

¿¬±¸ÁøÀº Áö±¸ ±âÈÄ ¸ðµ¨À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ¿Â½Ç°¡½º ¹èÃâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àú°¨ ³ë·Â ¾øÀÌ ÇöÀç ¿À¿°¹°Áú ¹èÃâ Ãß¼¼°¡ 2035³â±îÁö Áö¼ÓµÈ´Ù¸é(RCP 8.5), Áö±¸ÀÇ ±â¿ÂÀÌ 1970³â¿¡¼­ 1999³â »çÀÌÀÇ Æò±ÕÄ¡º¸´Ù 1µµ ³ô¾ÆÁö´Â °ÍÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×¸®°í SRMÀÌ 25³â°£ µµÀԵǾú´Ù°¡ °©ÀÚ±â ÁߴܵǾúÀ» °æ¿ì, Áö±¸ÀÇ ±â¿ÂÀº ±× ÀÌÈÄ¿¡ 4µµ »ó½ÂÇÔÀÌ È®ÀεǾú´Ù.

±âÁØÀÌ µÇ´Â ¿Â½Ç°¡½º ¹èÃâÀÇ Áõ°¡·Î ÀÎÇÑ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ »ó½Â·üÀº Áö³­ ¼¼±â¿¡ °Þ¾ú´ø ¼öÄ¡¸¦ ÈξÀ ¶Ù¾î³Ñ°Ô µÉ °ÍÀÌ¸ç µ¿ÀÏ ±â°£ µ¿¾È SRMÀÌ ¾Æ¿¹ µµÀÔµÇÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ» °æ¿ìÀÇ µÎ ¹èÀÎ 2µµ »ó½Âº¸´Ù ±â¿ÂÀÌ ´õ »ó½ÂÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

Áö¿ªÀû, °èÀýÀûÀÎ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ º¸¸é, Áö±¸ ±â¿ÂÀÇ »ó½ÂÀº °Ü¿ï¿¡ °íÀ§µµ Áö¿ª¿¡¼­ Àý´ëÀûÀ¸·Î Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³¯ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ±× µ¿¾È °üÂûµÈ ±â¿Â º¯µ¿ ¼öÄ¡¿Í ºñ±³Çϸé, ±â¿ÂÀÇ º¯È­´Â ³²¾Æ½Ã¾Æ¿Í »çÇ϶ó »ç¸· À̳²ÀÇ ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«¿Í °°Àº ¿­´ë Áö¹æÀÇ ¿©¸§Ã¶¿¡ °¡Àå Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³¯ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Áö¿ªµéÀº ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î ±â¿ÂÀÇ º¯µ¿ÀÌ ¸Å¿ì Àû´Ù.

º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ÁÖ ÀúÀÚÀÎ ¿ö½ÌÅÏ´ëÇб³(University of Washington)ÀÇ Kelly McCusker´Â º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ »ç¿ëµÈ ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç °á°ú¿¡ µû¸£¸é ³²¾Æ½Ã¾Æ¿Í »çÇ϶ó »ç¸· À̳²ÀÇ ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«¿Í °°Àº ¿­´ë Áö¿ªÀº ±â¿ÂÀÇ »ó½ÂÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ Å¸°ÝÀ» °¡Àå Å©°Ô ¹ÞÀ» °ÍÀ̸ç, µ¿½Ã¿¡ ÀÌ Áö¿ªÀº ¼¼°è¿¡¼­ ½Ä·®ÀÌ °¡Àå ºÎÁ·ÇÑ Áö¿ªÀ̱⠶§¹®¿¡ ±× ¿µÇâÀº ´õ Ŭ °ÍÀ̶ó°í ¼³¸íÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ±â¿Â º¯È­´Â ÀáÀçÀûÀ¸·Î »ý¹°ÇÐÀû ´Ù¾ç¼º¿¡ ½É°¢ÇÑ À§ÇùÀ» ÃÊ·¡ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.

¶ÇÇÑ º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÇâÈÄ ¹ß»ý °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ³ôÀº ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¿Â½Ç°¡½º ½Ã³ª¸®¿À¿Í SRM Á¾·á ½ÃÁ¡¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ¿¬±¸Çϱâ À§ÇØ °£´ÜÇÑ ±âÈÄ ¸ðµ¨À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× °á°ú´Â ¿Â½ÇÈ¿°ú·Î ÀÎÇØ ±âÈÄ°¡ ¾ó¸¶³ª ¿Â³­ÇØÁú °ÍÀΰ¡¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»´Â ±âÈÄ ¹Î°¨µµ°¡ ±âÈĺ¯È­À²¿¡ ´õ ÀûÀº ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌħÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¾ú´Ù. ±× ´ë½Å ±âÈĺ¯È­À²Àº ¿Â½Ç°¡½º ¹èÃâ·®°ú SRMÀÌ ½ÃÇàµÇ´Â ½Ã±â°¡ ¾ðÁ¦±îÁö Áö¼ÓµÇ´Â°¡¿¡ ÀÇÇØ °áÁ¤µÇ´Â °ÍÀÌ È®ÀεǾú´Ù.

¿¬±¸ÁøÀº SRMÀÌ Áß´ÜµÈ ÈÄ ±Þ»ó½ÂÇÏ´Â ±â¿ÂÀ» ÀÏÂ÷ÀûÀ¸·Î Á¦¾îÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ±âÁØÀÌ µÇ´Â ¿Â½Ç°¡½º ³óµµ¶ó°í µ¡ºÙ¿´´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ¿Â½Ç°¡½º ¹èÃâÀÌ ´õ Áõ°¡ÇÑ´Ù¸é, Áö±¸ ±â¿ÂÀº ´õ Å« ÆøÀ¸·Î »ó½ÂÇÒ °ÍÀÌ°í, ÀÌ¿Í À¯»çÇÏ°Ô ¿Â½Ç°¡½º ¹èÃâÀÌ Áö¼ÓµÇ´Â µ¿¾È SRM Áß´Ü ½Ã±â°¡ ´ÊÃçÁú¼ö·Ï ±â¿ÂÀÇ »ó½Â·üÀº ´õ Áõ°¡ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ. SRMÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ Áö±¸ ±â¿Â »ó½ÂÀ¸·Î ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ÇÇÇظ¦ ÁÙÀ̱â À§ÇÑ À¯ÀÏÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀº µ¿½Ã¿¡ ¿Â½Ç°¡½º ¹èÃâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °­·ÂÇÑ ±ÔÁ¦¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ´Â °Í»ÓÀÌ´Ù.

[Ãâó : KISTI ¹Ì¸®¾È(http://mirian.kisti.re.kr) ¡º±Û·Î¹úµ¿Çâºê¸®ÇÎ(GTB)¡»2014. 02. 21]
 
[¿ø¹®º¸±â]
 
Global warming: Warning against abrupt stop to geoengineering method (if started)
 
As a range of climate change mitigation scenarios are discussed, University of Washington researchers have found that the injection of sulfate particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight and curb the effects of global warming could pose a severe threat if not maintained indefinitely and supported by strict reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
 
The new study, published today, 18 February, in IOP Publishing's journal Environmental Research Letters, has highlighted the risks of large and spatially expansive temperature increases if solar radiation management (SRM) is abruptly stopped once it has been implemented.
 
SRM is a proposed method of geoengineering whereby tiny sulfate-based aerosols are released into the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight and cool the planet. The technique has been shown to be economically and technically feasible; however, its efficacy depends on its continued maintenance, without interruption from technical faults, global cooperation breakdown or funding running dry.
 
According to the study, global temperature increases could more than double if SRM is implemented for a multi-decadal period of time and then suddenly stopped, in relation to the temperature increases expected if SRM was not implemented at all.
 
The researchers used a global climate model to show that if an extreme emissions pathway -- RCP8.5 -- is followed up until 2035, allowing temperatures to rise 1¡ÆC above the 1970-1999 mean, and then SRM is implemented for 25 years and suddenly stopped, global temperatures could increase by 4¡ÆC in the following decades.
 
This rate of increase, caused by the build-up of background greenhouse gas emissions, would be well beyond the bounds experienced in the last century and more than double the 2¡ÆC temperature increase that would occur in the same timeframe if SRM had not been implemented.
 
On a regional and seasonal scale, the temperature changes would be largest in an absolute sense in winter over high latitude land, but compared to historical fluctuations, temperature changes would be largest in the tropics in summertime, where there is usually very little variation.
 
Lead author of the research, Kelly McCusker, from the University of Washington, said: "According to our simulations, tropical regions like South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa are hit particularly hard, the very same regions that are home to many of the world's most food insecure populations. The potential temperature changes also pose a severe threat to biodiversity."
 
Furthermore, the researchers used a simple climate model to study a variety of plausible greenhouse gas scenarios and SRM termination years over the 21st century. They showed that climate sensitivity -- a measure of how much the climate will warm in response to the greenhouse effect -- had a lesser impact on the rate of temperature changes.
 
Instead, they found that the rates of temperature change were determined by the amount of GHG emissions and the duration of time that SRM is deployed.
 
"The primary control over the magnitude of the large temperature increases after an SRM shutoff is the background greenhouse gas concentrations. Thus, the greater the future emissions of greenhouse gases, the larger the temperature increases would be, and, similarly, the later the termination occurs while GHG emissions continue, the larger the temperature increases," continued McCusker.
 
"The only way to avoid creating the risk of substantial temperature increases through SRM, therefore, is concurrent strong reductions of GHG emissions."
 
¨Ï±Û·Î¹ú¹°»ê¾÷Á¤º¸¼¾ÅÍ(www.waterindustry.co.kr) ¹«´ÜÀüÀç ¹× Àç¹èÆ÷±ÝÁö
ÀÌÀü±Û [À¯·´] Æó±â¹°·ÎºÎÅÍ ÈñÅä·ù ȸ¼ö¸¦ À§ÇØ ³ë·Â
´ÙÀ½±Û [UAE] µÎ¹ÙÀÌ ÀÎÇÁ¶ó È®Àå Áö¼Ó
±Û·Î¹ú¹°»ê¾÷Á¤º¸¼¾ÅÍ.   ¼¾ÅÍÀå : ¹èö¹Î
ÁÖ¼Ò : ¼­¿ï½Ã ¼ÛÆı¸ »ïÀüµ¿ 72-3 À¯¸²ºôµù 5Ãþ TEL (02) 3431-0210   FAX (02) 3431-0260   E-mail waterindustry@hanmail.net
COPYRIGHT(C) 2012 ±Û·Î¹ú¹°»ê¾÷Á¤º¸¼¾ÅÍ. ALL RIGHT RESERVED.