Áñ°Üã±â Ãß°¡     ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö·Î ¼³Á¤ óÀ½À¸·Î  l  ·Î±×ÀΠ l  È¸¿ø°¡ÀÔ  l  »çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

>
ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ   l   ¾ÆÀ̵ð/ºñ¹Ð¹øȣã±â
¡®Á¦38ȸ 2023³â »ó¹Ý±â ...
¡®Á¦37ȸ 2022³â ÇϹݱâ ...
Á¦37ȸ ¡¸2022³â ÇϹݱâ ...
 
HOME > ÇؿܽÃÀåÁ¤º¸ > ÃֽŴº½º
[2014] [¹Ì±¹] ±¼ ¾ç½ÄÀ» ÅëÇÑ °­ ¾î±Í ¼öÁúÀÇ Çâ»ó
À̸§ °ü¸®ÀÚ waterindustry@hanmail.net ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ 2014.04.15 Á¶È¸¼ö 688
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ

[¹Ì±¹] ±¼ ¾ç½ÄÀ» ÅëÇÑ °­ ¾î±Í ¼öÁúÀÇ Çâ»ó

°úÇÐÀú³Î Aquatic Geochemistry¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¹ßÇ¥µÈ NOAA¿Í ¹Ì±¹ ÁöÁú¿¬±¸¼Ò(U.S. Geological Survey, USGS)ÀÇ ¿¬±¸¿¡ µû¸£¸é Æ÷Åä¸Æ °­(Potomac River)ÀÇ ¾î±Í¿¡¼­ ±¼ ¾ç½ÄÀ» ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ÇÏõ¼öÁúÀÇ Çâ»ó¿¡ Å« µµ¿òÀÌ µÇ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 

Æ÷Åä¸Æ °­ ¹Ù´ÚÀÇ 40ÆÛ¼¾Æ®°¡ Á¶°³·ù ¾ç½Ä¿¡ »ç¿ëµÉ °æ¿ì, °­ ¾î±Í¸¦ ¿À¿°½ÃÅ°°í ÀÖ´Â Áú¼Ò ¼ººÐÀÌ ¸ðµÎ Á¦°ÅµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½ÀÌ ¹àÇôÁ³´Ù. ¿¬±¸ÁøÀº ¾ç½Ä°ú ±¼ »êÈ£ÀÇ º¹¿øÀÌ ÇÔ²² ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö¸é º¸´Ù Å« »ýÅÂÇÐÀû À̵æÀ» Á¦°øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÓÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±¼Àº ¼öÁú ¾ÇÈ­ÀÇ ¿øÀÎÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Á¶·ùÀÇ ¸¹Àº ¾çÀ» Á¤È­½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. 

º» ¿¬±¸´Â µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¸ðµ¨¸µ°ú »ýÅÂ°è ¹üÀ§¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °úÇÐÀûÀÎ Æò°¡¸¦ ±â¹ÝÀ¸·Î ¼öÇàµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¼ö°è ³»¿¡¼­ ÀϾ´Â È°µ¿µéÀÌ °­ ¾î±ÍÀÇ ¼öÁú¿¡ ¾î¶°ÇÑ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â°¡¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸ÁøÀº Æ÷Åä¸Æ °­ÀÇ »ó·ù¼ö·ÎºÎÅÍÀÇ Áú¼Ò È帧°ú °­ ¾î±Í¿¡¼­ ÀϾ´Â ¿µ¾ç¿°°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ¼öÁú »óÅ (ºÎ¿µ¾çÈ­)¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 

ºÎ¿µ¾çÈ­´Â ¼ö°è¿¡ ¿µ¾ç¿°ÀÌ °úµµÇÏ°Ô ¿ëÇØµÇ¾î ¼öÁ߽Ĺ°ÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀ» ÃËÁø½ÃÅ°°í, ÀÌ´Â ¹®Á¦°¡ µÇ´Â Á¶·ù ´ëÁõ½ÄÀ» ÀÏÀ¸Å°´Â ¿øÀÎÀÌ µÈ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Á¶·ùÀÇ Áõ½ÄÀº ¼öÁß¿¡ ³ì¾Æ ÀÖ´Â »ê¼Ò¸¦ °í°¥½ÃÄÑ ÇØÃÊ°¡ ÀÚ¶óÁö ¸øÇϵµ·Ï ÇÑ´Ù. 

¿¬±¸ÁøÀº ±âÁ¸ÀÇ À°Áö ±â¹Ý ºÐ¼®À» º¸¿ÏÇÏ¿© Á¶°³·ùÀÇ ¾ç½Ä, ƯÈ÷ ±¼ÀÇ ¾ç½ÄÀÌ ¼ö°è¿¡¼­ ¿µ¾ç¼ººÐÀ» Á÷Á¢ÀûÀ¸·Î Á¦°ÅÇÏ´Â µ¥¿¡ ¾î¶»°Ô »ç¿ëµÉ ¼ö Àִ°¡¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 

°­ ¾î±ÍÁö¿ªÀÇ °­¹Ù´Ú¿¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â ¿µ¾ç¿°À» Á¦°ÅÇϱâ À§Çؼ­´Â ±¼À» Å°¿ì´Â °ÍÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏÁö¸¸, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °ü¸® ¹æ¹ýÀº ÀÌ Áö¿ªÀÇ ¼­·Î »óÃæµÇ´Â »ç¿ë¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ½ÃÇàµÇ±â´Â Èûµé¾î º¸ÀδÙ. ±×·¯³ª »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î Á¼Àº Áö¿ª¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­´Â ¾ç½ÄÀå ÀÓ´ë°¡ Çã¿ëµÉ °æ¿ì Å« À̵æÀ» ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡ µû¸£¸é ¸¸¾à °­¹Ù´ÚÀÇ 15¿¡¼­ 20ÆÛ¼¾Æ®°¡ ¾ç½Ä¿¡ »ç¿ëµÈ´Ù¸é À¯ÀԵǴ ¿µ¾ç¿°ÀÇ °ÅÀÇ ¹ÝÀ» Á¦°ÅÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. 

NOAAÀÇ Suzanne Bricker ¹Ú»ç´Â º» ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ ±¼ ¾ç½ÄÀÌ »ýÅ°èÀÇ ÀϺΠ±ÕÇüÀ» ȸº¹½ÃÅ°´Â µ¥¿¡ ¾ó¸¸Å­ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â°¡¸¦ º¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù°í ¼³¸íÇÏ¿´´Ù. Æ÷Åä¸Æ °­ ¾î±ÍÀÇ ºÎ¿µ¾çÈ­ »óÅ´ ü»çÇÇÅ© ¸¸(Chesapeake Bay)À» Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ¹Ì±¹ ³» ¸¹Àº °­¾î±Í Áö¿ª¿¡¼­ ¹ß°ßÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â »óŸ¦ ´ëº¯ÇÑ´Ù. ¿ª»çÀûÀ¸·Î, Æ÷Åä¸Æ °­°ú ü»çÇÇÅ© Áö¿ªÀÇ °­¾î±ÍÀÇ ÇÏõ¼ö´Â ±¼¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Á¤È­µÇ¾î ¿ÔÀ¸³ª, ±¼ÀÇ °³Ã¼¼ö°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ±¼ÀÇ ¿©°ú´É·Â ¶ÇÇÑ °¨¼ÒÇØ ¿Ô´Ù. ±× °á°ú·Î ¿µ¾ç¿°ÀÇ ³óµµ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÀÌ¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ ¼öÁú¹®Á¦(Á¶·ù Áõ½Ä ¹× ¼öÁß »ê¼Ò³óµµ °¨¼Ò) µîÀÇ ¹®Á¦µéÀÌ ´ëµÎµÇ¾ú´Ù. 

Æ÷Åä¸Æ °­ ¾î±ÍÀÇ ºÎ¿µ¾çÈ­ Çö»óÀ» ÁÙÀ̱â À§ÇÑ °¡Àå Æí¸®ÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀº ±¼ ¾ç½Ä°ú ±¼»êÈ£ º¹¿ø°ú ÇÔ²² À°Áö¿¡¼­ À¯ÀԵǴ ¿µ¾ç¿°ÀÇ ¾çÀ» Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î ÁÙÀÌ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀº ¿µ¾ç¿°ÀÇ ¾ç°ú ºÎ¿µ¾çÈ­ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» Á÷Á¢ÀûÀ¸·Î ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Àå±âÀûÀÌ°í Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ¼öÁú ¹®Á¦¿¡ Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ ÇØ°á ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇØ ÁØ´Ù. 

¼öÁú °ü¸®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌ ´ë¾ÈÀû Á¢±ÙÀº »ç¶÷ÀÌ ¸Ô¾î¼­´Â ¾È µÇ´Â ¿À¿°¹°ÁúÀÌ ¾ø´Ù¸é ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ ÆǸŠ°¡´ÉÇÑ Çػ깰À» »ý»êÇϵµ·Ï ÇÏ°í ±¼ ¾ç½Ä¾÷ÀÚµéÀÌ ±¼¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¼öÁú Á¤È­¿¡ µû¸¥ ºñ¿ëÀ» ¹ÞÀ½À¸·Î½á ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ Ãß°¡ÀûÀÎ ¼Òµæ¿¡ µû¶ó Áö¿ª °æÁ¦¸¦ È°¼ºÈ­½ÃŲ´Ù. 

ü»çÇÇÅ© ¸¸À¸·Î Èê·¯µé¾î°¡´Â Æ÷Åä¸Æ °­Àº ´ë¼­¾ç ¿¬¾È¿¡¼­ 4¹ø°·Î °¡Àå Å« ÇÏõÀ̸ç, À¯¿ª¿¡ 6¹é¸¸ ¸í ÀÌ»óÀÇ Àα¸°¡ °ÅÁÖÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. Àΰ£ È°µ¿ÀÌ ¼öÁú¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ NOAA¿Í USGSÀÇ ¿¬±¸´Â 1990³â´ë ÃÊ¹Ý ÀÌÈÄ·Î ³ôÀº ¿µ¾ç¿° ¼öÄ¡·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¿µÇâÀº Àü¹ÝÀûÀ¸·Î º¯È­ÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ½À» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×·¯³ª °­ ¾î±Í »ó·ù¿¡¼­ ¼ö°è·ÎºÎÅÍÀÇ Áú¼Ò ºÎÇÏ °¨¼Ò, ¿ëÁ¸ »ê¼Ò·®ÀÇ Áõ°¡ ¹× Á¶·ù Áõ½Ä °¨¼Ò, Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ÇØÃÊÀÇ À缺Àå µî ÀϺΠ¼öÁú Çâ»óÀÇ Áõ°ÅµéÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÑ´Ù. 

ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼öÁú Çâ»óÀÇ Áõ°ÅµéÀÌ º¸ÀÌ°í ÀÖÀ¸³ª, ºÎ¿µ¾çÈ­´Â ¿©ÀüÈ÷ ¿°·ÁµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â ¹®Á¦ÀÌ´Ù. ¼öÁúÀ» °áÁ¤ÇÏ´Â ÁÖ¿ä ÀÎÀÚÀÎ ¿ëÁ¸»ê¼Ò´Â ¾î·ù¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ¸¹Àº ¼öÁß »ý¹°ÀÌ »ì¾Æ°¡±â À§Çؼ­´Â ÇʼöÀûÀÎ ¿ä¼ÒÀÌ´Ù. 

È­¼®¿¬·áÀÇ ¿¬¼Ò·ÎºÎÅÍ °¡½º¿Í ÀÔÀÚ»ó ¹°ÁúµéÀÌ ´ë±â·Î ¹èÃâµÇ°í ÀÌ°ÍÀÌ À°Áö¿¡ ¿À¿°¹°Áú·Î µÇµ¹¾Æ°¡´Â Çö»óÀÎ ´ë±â ħÀû(atmospheric deposition) ¶ÇÇÑ °­ ¾î±Í¸¦ ¿À¿°½ÃÅ°´Â ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÑ´Ù. 

¿¬±¸ÁøÀº ´ë±âħÀûÀÌ °­ »ó·ù¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÇÏ´Â °Í¿¡´Â »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ÁÖÀǸ¦ ±â¿ïÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Æ ¿ÔÁö¸¸, ´ë±â¿À¿° Á¤È­¹ý(Clean Air Act)°ú ±× °³Á¤¹ýÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ÇöÀç´Â »ê¼º¹°Áú ¹èÃâÀÌ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù°í ¼³¸íÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×·³¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í ´ë±â ħÀûÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ¹Ý¿µÇÏ´Â »ê¸² ³»¿¡ È帣´Â ½Ã³»¿Í °­ »ó·ù¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀº °è¼Ó Áö¼ÓµÇ¾î¾ß Çϸç, ±×¸¦ ÅëÇØ ´ë±â ħÀû°ú ¿¬°üµÈ ¼öÁúÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ÃßÀûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÉ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. 

¿¬±¸ÁøÀº º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú°¡ Á¶°³·ù ¾ç½ÄÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁú ¼ö Àִ ü»çÇÇÅ© Áö¿ª°ú ¹Ì±¹ ³» ¸¹Àº ¿¬¾È Áö¿ªÀÇ °­ ¾î±Í¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÏ°Ô »ç¿ëµÉ ¼ö Àֱ⸦ Èñ¸ÁÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù.

[Ãâó : KISTI ¹Ì¸®¾È ¡º±Û·Î¹úµ¿Çâºê¸®ÇΡ»/ 2014³â 4¿ù 15ÀÏ]

[¿ø¹®º¸±â]

Oyster aquaculture could significantly improve Potomac River estuary water quality


Oyster aquaculture in the Potomac River estuary could result in significant improvements to water quality, according to a new NOAA and U.S. Geological Survey study published in the journal Aquatic Geochemistry.

All of the nitrogen currently polluting the Potomac River estuary could be removed if 40 percent of its river bed were used for shellfish cultivation, according to the joint study. The researchers determined that a combination of aquaculture and restored oyster reefs may provide even larger overall ecosystem benefits. Oysters, who feed by filtering, can clean an enormous volume of water of algae which can cause poor water quality.

The study is based on data modeling and an ecosystem-wide scientific evaluation, which examined how activities in the watershed affected the river estuary's water quality. The research team evaluated nitrogen flows from the Potomac River headwaters and the nutrient-related water quality conditions of the estuary, called eutrophication.

Eutrophication takes place when a body of water becomes enriched in dissolved nutrients that stimulate the growth of aquatic plants, causing nuisance algal blooms. These blooms often result in the depletion of dissolved oxygen and the loss of seagrasses.

The team sought to assess how shellfish aquaculture -- specifically oyster aquaculture -- could be used to remove nutrients directly from the water, complementing traditional land-based measures.

Although the estuary bottom area needed to grow oysters to remove the nutrients exists, it is unlikely that such a management measure would be implemented because of conflicting uses. However, a smaller area could still provide great benefits if aquaculture leases were approved. According to the study, if only 15 to 20 percent of the bottom was cultivated it could remove almost half of the incoming nutrients.

"Our study looked to see just how much impact oyster aquaculture could have in restoring some balance to the system," said Suzanne Bricker, Ph.D., physical scientist in NOAA's National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science and the paper's lead author. "Eutrophication conditions in the Potomac River estuary are representative of conditions found in the Chesapeake Bay and many other U.S. estuaries. Historically, waters of the Potomac and other Chesapeake region estuaries were filtered by oysters, but as their populations declined so did their filtration capabilities. This resulted in increased concentrations of nutrients and related water quality concerns, such as algal blooms and low dissolved oxygen.

"The most expedient way to reduce eutrophication in the Potomac River estuary would be to continue reducing land-based nutrients complemented by a combination of aquaculture and restored oyster reefs. The resulting combination could provide significant removal of nutrients and eutrophication impacts directly from the water column, and offer innovative solutions to long-term persistent water quality problems."

This alternative approach to water quality management has the potential to address legacy pollution, provide a marketable seafood product if there are no other contaminant issues that would prevent human consumption, and enhance local economies with additional income to growers through the possible development of a program -- similar to those being considered in other parts of the country -- where growers would be paid for the water cleaning services done by their oysters.

Flowing into the Chesapeake Bay, the Potomac River is the fourth largest river on the Atlantic coast, with more than six million people living in its watershed. The NOAA and USGS research about human influences on water quality found that the effects of high nutrient levels have not changed overall since the early 1990s. There are, however, some signs of improvement, such as decreased nitrogen loads from the watershed, increased dissolved oxygen and decreased algal blooms in the upper estuary, and continued regrowth of seagrasses.

While scientists have seen signs of improvement, they remain concerned with eutrophication. Dissolved oxygen, a key measure of water quality, is something fish and other aquatic species can't survive without.
Atmospheric deposition -- where gases and particles are released into the atmosphere from combustion of fossil fuels and return to the land as contaminants -- also plays a role in polluting the estuary.

"Less attention has been paid to monitoring the effects of atmospheric deposition in headwater streams now that acidic emissions have declined because of the Clean Air Act and Amendments going into effect," said Karen Rice, Ph.D., USGS research hydrologist. "Nevertheless, monitoring of forested, headwater streams that reflect changes in atmospheric inputs should be continued, if not expanded, so that changes in stream-water quality as related to atmospheric deposition can be tracked."

The researchers believe the results of the study may be useful on a broad basis, as there are other river-dominated estuaries in the Chesapeake region and elsewhere along the U.S. coastline that could support shellfish aquaculture.
¨Ï±Û·Î¹ú¹°»ê¾÷Á¤º¸¼¾ÅÍ(www.waterindustry.co.kr) ¹«´ÜÀüÀç ¹× Àç¹èÆ÷±ÝÁö
ÀÌÀü±Û [±Û·Î¹úÀÎÆ÷¸ÞÀ̼Ç] °Ç¹°ÀÏüÇü ž籤¹ßÀü À¯¸® ½ÃÀå, 2019³â 27¾ï ´Þ·¯ Àü¸Á
´ÙÀ½±Û [Äí¿þÀÌÆ®] KNPCÀÇ ½Å±Ô Á¤À¯°øÀå ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ® Áß ÆÐÅ°Áö 4¹ø
±Û·Î¹ú¹°»ê¾÷Á¤º¸¼¾ÅÍ.   ¼¾ÅÍÀå : ¹èö¹Î
ÁÖ¼Ò : ¼­¿ï½Ã ¼ÛÆı¸ »ïÀüµ¿ 72-3 À¯¸²ºôµù 5Ãþ TEL (02) 3431-0210   FAX (02) 3431-0260   E-mail waterindustry@hanmail.net
COPYRIGHT(C) 2012 ±Û·Î¹ú¹°»ê¾÷Á¤º¸¼¾ÅÍ. ALL RIGHT RESERVED.