Áñ°Üã±â Ãß°¡     ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö·Î ¼³Á¤ óÀ½À¸·Î  l  ·Î±×ÀΠ l  È¸¿ø°¡ÀÔ  l  »çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

>
ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ   l   ¾ÆÀ̵ð/ºñ¹Ð¹øȣã±â
¡®Á¦38ȸ 2023³â »ó¹Ý±â ...
¡®Á¦37ȸ 2022³â ÇϹݱâ ...
Á¦37ȸ ¡¸2022³â ÇϹݱâ ...
 
HOME > »óÇϼöµµ > Çϼö/Æó¼ö
[¹Ì±¹] ¿ì¸®°¡ ¸¶½Ã´Â ¹°¿¡¼­ ¹ß°ßµÇ´Â ¹Ì·® È­ÇÐ ¹°Áú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ëó¹æ¾È
À̸§ °ü¸®ÀÚ waterindustry@hanmail.net ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ 2014.01.20 Á¶È¸¼ö 291
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ
[¹Ì±¹] ¿ì¸®°¡ ¸¶½Ã´Â ¹°¿¡¼­ ¹ß°ßµÇ´Â ¹Ì·® È­ÇÐ ¹°Áú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ëó¹æ¾È
 
¸¶½Ã´Â ¹°¿¡ ÀÖ´Â ¼Ò·®ÀÇ È­ÇÐ ¹°Áú¿¡ ´ëÇØ À̾߱âÇϱâ Àü¿¡ ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡¸¦ ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±¹°¡ ¼öÁú ¿À¿°ÀÌ ÁøÇàµÇ´Â ¹æÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­ ÀνÄÇÑ ÇÊ¿ä°¡ ÀÖ´Ù.
 
West VirginiaÀÇ ³ª»Û ¼öÁú
 
±¹°¡´Â ±¹°¡ ºñ»ó »çÅ¿¡¼­ÀÇ West Virginia¿¡ÀÖ´Â ¾ÆÈ© Ä«¿îƼ Áö¿ª¿¡ ÁÖ½ÃÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ¼®Åº ó¸® È­ÇÐ ¹°ÁúÀÌ °­À¸·Î Èê·¯µé¾î°¡°í ¿À¿°µÈ ¹°ÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. Á¤È­ÀÛ¾÷ÀÌ ÁøÇàµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ±×µéÀÇ ½Ä¼ö ½Ã½ºÅÛ Áß È­ÇÐ ¹°ÁúÀ» ¼¼Ã´ÇÏ´Â ½Ãµµ·Î, °ü¸®´Â ¾ÈÀüÇÑ È­ÇÐ ¹°ÁúÀÇ ¼öÁØÀ» °áÁ¤Çϱâ À§ÇØ ³ë·ÂÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù.
 
¿þ½ºÆ® Virgina °øº¸ÀÇ ÄË ¿öµå ÁִϾî´Â Áö¹æ°ú ¿¬¹æ °ü¸®´Â Á¶ 4 methylcyclohexanemethanol (¼®Åº ó¸® È­ÇÐ)ÀÇ "¹é¸¸ ºÐÀÇ 1 ºÎºÐÀº"»ç¶÷µéÀÌ ¸¶½Ã±â¿¡ ¾ÈÀüÇÏ´Ù°í º¸°íÇß´Ù.
 
[¿ø¹®º¸±â]
 
What should we do about the trace chemicals found in drinking water?
 
 
Before I talk about the small bits of chemicals often found in drinking water, I want to direct some attention to the national water contamination story going on now because I think it reveals something.
 
 
The water is bad in West Virginia
 
The nation has its eyes on a nine-county area in West Virginia that¡¯s under a state of emergency. A coal-processing chemical leaked into a river and poisoned the drinking water there.
 
Cleanup is ongoing. As they attempt to flush the chemical out of their drinking water systems, officials are trying to determine what level of the chemical is safe.
 
Ken Ward Jr. of the West Virgina Gazette reports that local and federal officials are saying that "1 part per million" of crude 4-methylcyclohexanemethanol (the coal processing chemical) is safe for people to drink.
 
But Ward is having a tough time finding out what they based that number on:
 
 
When asked for more information about where the number came from, Department of Health and Human Resources Secretary Karen Bowling pointed to the "material safety data sheet," or MSDS, from Eastman, the maker of the chemical that leaked.
 
 
Bowling, though, downplayed the fact that there is precious little toxicological data and few – if any –public and peer-reviewed studies of what the chemical would do to humans if ingested.
 
 
There it is. The research on how these chemicals affect our health can be pretty thin.
 
 
Trace amounts of chemicals in drinking water
 
 
Around much of the nation, the fact that chemicals get into our drinking water has been known for some time. We¡¯re talking tiny amounts. Scientists use terms like "parts per billion" or "nanograms."
 
The kinds of chemicals found depends on what gets into the water.
 
 
Larry Sanford is the assistant manager of the Ann Arbor Water Treatment plant. On a recent tour of the plant, he read from a list of chemicals researchers found going into the drinking water supply. These were trace amounts of chemicals found after the treatment process.
 
 
"Ibuprofen¡¦ Carbamazepine – I¡¯ve never said that word before. Seventeen b estradiol ¡¦ 17 a ethinyl estradiol, and estrone, and estriol, and cholesterol, and coprostanol."
 
 
Baylor University researchers tested the drinking water in Grand Rapids, Monroe, and Ann Arbor back in 2005.
 
 
The researchers were looking for trace amounts of pharmaceuticals and personal-care products in the water. Our bodies don¡¯t take up all of the medicine in birth control pills, or antidepressants, or even coffee.
 
 
You go to the bathroom, and the extra stuff gets flushed down the drain. Small amounts end up in the drinking water.
 
 
The water samples in Ann Arbor showed that 19 different types of drugs were going into the treatment plant. And the treatment process took out eight of them.
 
 
Sanford called that "serendipity."
 
 
"None of these plants were built with the intention of removing any of this stuff," said Sanford. "You just get the removal based on what¡¯s there already.
 
Now when you decide what it is you want to remove, then you¡¯ll have to build a treatment facility that will take that out. It may take other things out at the same time, it may not.¡±
 
 
[̉˜: Michigan Radio / 2014.01.14]
¨Ï±Û·Î¹ú¹°»ê¾÷Á¤º¸¼¾ÅÍ(www.waterindustry.co.kr) ¹«´ÜÀüÀç ¹× Àç¹èÆ÷±ÝÁö
ÀÌÀü±Û [µ¶ÀÏ] IFAT 2014 ÇϼöÀÇ ÀçÈ°À» Ž±¸
´ÙÀ½±Û [ÇÁ·Î½ºÆ® ¾Ø ¼³¸®¹ø] °ÉÇÁÁö¿ª »ê¾÷¿ë Æó¼ö ¹× ¼öÁúó¸® È­ÇнÃÀå º¸°í¼­ ¹ßÇ¥
±Û·Î¹ú¹°»ê¾÷Á¤º¸¼¾ÅÍ.   ¼¾ÅÍÀå : ¹èö¹Î
ÁÖ¼Ò : ¼­¿ï½Ã ¼ÛÆı¸ »ïÀüµ¿ 72-3 À¯¸²ºôµù 5Ãþ TEL (02) 3431-0210   FAX (02) 3431-0260   E-mail waterindustry@hanmail.net
COPYRIGHT(C) 2012 ±Û·Î¹ú¹°»ê¾÷Á¤º¸¼¾ÅÍ. ALL RIGHT RESERVED.